ETERNAL SHAME
A preface to re-publication of a 2017 editorial.
Once again, we must reflect. The word majestically chosen to catch the mood was ‘sombre’ but that was over seven years ago.
Now the Enquiry is done, the report made public, the word is ‘shame’ but not mere pity, for this is a lasting shame, a disgrace that provokes outrage — guilt that has yet to be prosecuted, settled, resolved, satisfied, or in current parlance, closed.
The UK’s House of Lords has a great many committees to keep an eye on the state of the State including the Statutory Inquiries Committee — yes, an august body to Inquire about Enquiries — and their words, thankfully, are not minced.
The Chair of this learned body said, “‘Lessons learned’ is an entirely vacuous phrase if lessons aren’t being learned because inquiry recommendations are ignored or delayed. Furthermore, it is insulting and upsetting for victims, survivors and their families who frequently hope that, from their unimaginable grief, something positive might prevail.”
The timing of these truths, landing between Party conferences where Leaders speak of trust — the lack of it and need for repair — and a succession of Enquiries, Grenfell, Horizon Post Office, Contaminated Blood, Covid, to name just a few of the bumper 2024 crop, reinforces national despair as chickens come home.
Seven years on from Grenfell, I must return to my words written just days after the Grenfell disaster and pray that ‘sombre’ reflection, now transposed to eternal shame, is demonstrably pinned on organisations (corporate and politic) whose stature is reduced to ashes. Financial or custodial penalties will never satisfy the need for ever present reminders of their lasting damage — and so we read again, and will read again with all the repetitous addictions of a child’s classic that must not be forgot.
Community Cohesion
First published 18th June 2017
‘Sombre’ was the word chosen this week by Her Majesty to describe the UK’s mood following the awful fire tragedy in West London.
Once again, the media lauded heroic responses and the generosity of the wider public towards those shattered families who have lost everything.
Once again great community strength was exposed — and this time, sadly, evidenced by their repeated well-documented warnings of a disaster waiting to happen.
But, this disaster was very different.
After the Westminster Bridge car rampage, the bomb in Manchester, a terrorist arrest in Whitehall and the Borough Market/London Bridge van and knife rampage, this week’s consuming fire was entirely of our own national making with no reason/excuse to attribute blame to some other malignant force.
This disaster was also very different in its aftermath.
Whereas in Manchester the local leadership response was strong and immediate (and in Central London we marvelled at the 8-minute incident closure) local citizens and the media have rounded on the apparent lack of Governmental and Local leadership actions. The entire incident — from cause to conclusion — is raising fundamental questions.
Government Ministers, past and present, (and property-owning politicians with Landlord interests who voted against regulations on ‘fitness for habitation’) cannot escape or avoid deeper examination. Those who happily presided over the debilitating drive to cut costs and reduce Local Authorities to mere agencies for the delivery of top-down austerity will be held to account. As MP David Lamy said, we must now ask if the post-Thatcher shift away from public duty and towards private profit in the name of ‘efficiency’ requires us now to consider if the nation still believes in a welfare state with a safety net for citizens who fall on hard times.
The underlying design story is still unfolding — not least the marginal capital expenditure savings in choosing the cheapest building materials, the lack of sprinkler systems and alternative escape routes — but, beyond the physical, design failures in local empowerment and national democratic accountability cannot now be overlooked.
There are many factors that contribute to community well-being. One of those is Resilience — particularly the preparedness for unexpected disasters. From around the world, most of the examples of Resilience programmes stem from ‘natural’ disasters — floods, tsunamis, earthquakes, and wildfires. But Resilience needs also to be present in systemic design of administration and governance. The plight of ‘I Daniel Blake’ and a thousand other cuts to dignity imposed in thrall of efficient markets and a demonisation of local leadership has been exposed for its rampant retreat from the societal values that most of us hold dear. Deep down, naively perhaps, we do not expect leaders to lead us astray.
Not surprisingly local people in West London are now angry. They are now moving beyond the instinctive community-led support for their neighbours and re-examining these fundamental questions.
A week is a long time in politics. The recovery from this dreadful week will take years. It will demand new leadership at all levels of society. In that process there will be a great deal of learning — and it is in that reflection, as a nation, we may find some redemption.
‘Sombre’ has more than a hint of thoughtful silent sadness. The mourning process must be sober. A national get-well plan is urgently required.
___________________
NOTES
The article (Community Cohesion) was first published by Groupe Intellex in 2017. With its additional preface (Eternal Shame) it is now archived under Governance in the Groupe Intellex Medium library — a resource for students. The full text of the House of Lords report can be found via the hyperlink in paragraph three.
